Givers and Takers
We have all grown up in a give and take world. Remember the times when you were small and were either willing to share your toys and stuffed animals with your older/younger siblings, or wanted to accumulate as many of them as possible whether you were playing with them or not, or were willing to trade one of your objects for one of your younger/older sibling’s objects. This behavior continues to play out in our lives throughout our careers. And, it is the subject of Adam Grant’s 2013 book Give and Take as well as numerous essays and presentations.
[Grant has been recognized as the highest-rated teacher at The Wharton School for five straight years and is widely recognized as an influential management thinker. At the time he was awarded tenure, he was the youngest tenured professor in the history of the University of Pennsylvania.]
So, what’s this all about? Every time we interact with someone – at work, at play, at home, … – we make choices around reciprocity; we choose how we are going interact. Grant has identified three different basic styles for these interactions which he has called “Takers,” “Givers,” and “Matchers.” He defines these this way, recognizing that no one always acts in a single style:
Takers fundamentally see interactions at some level as an opportunity to advance their own interests. They act as if they deserve your help and don’t hesitate to impose on your time and energy. They try to get as much and contribute as little in return as possible, believing that this is the shortest and most direct path to achieving their own goals.
Givers have a high concern for others but a low concern for themselves. They look to help others by making an introduction, giving advice, providing mentoring, sharing knowledge, doing a task or project, joining a team, etc. They set a low boundary when it comes to responding to a spoken or even unspoken request for help. They tend to ignore their own needs and can easily exhaust themselves, and not have time to meet their own responsibilities. Burnout is a real possibility.
Matchers, which most of us are to some extent, are somewhere in between. They try to maintain a balance of give and take: If I help you, you’ll help me in return. These individuals trade favors evenly. They see matching as a set of transactions and expect that the ledgers will balance. In other words, they keep score.
At this point, you might be asking, “So what?” Why is this important? Perhaps, first off, Grant posits, “that how you respond to requests from [others] may be a decisive indicator of where you will end up on the ladder of personal success.”
His research spanning many fields and countries is interesting:
1. These three styles exist everywhere. You find them in engineering and in medicine, you find them in sales and in financial advisory services, you find them in university faculty, staff, and students, and you find them in social situations, etc.
2. Givers tend to be overrepresented at both the top and bottom of success metrics. At the bottom because they are so focused on giving to others that they don’t have time for their own work, which they neglect. And, they are represented at the top because of the good will and positive reputations they build with those they help and the work that they do. These activities build strong positive social capital. Unfortunately, givers also can easily burn out as they try to do their own work as they help others. Further, takers may also exploit them.
3. Givers typically make excellent team members. They collaborate, share ideas, are willing to pitch in and help reach team goals. They go the extra mile for the success of the team. Overall, they are good people to have around.
4. Takers are also over represented at the bottom of the success metrics. They tend to be widely seen as taking advantage of others. Takers have very broad networks, in part because when they burn one bridge they have to find new people to seek help from. Their unwillingness to collaborate and work in a focused way for the good of the team wears thin. Others often see them as not worthy of being helped. And, because of their high focus on themselves, they aren’t usually strong team players.
5. You can often spot a taker by the language he or she uses. They tend to use first person singular pronouns, “I” and “me” rather than “we” and “us.” They rarely give credit to others. Years ago in a world of Indian arranged marriages, a young woman about to become engaged wrote Mahatma Gandhi, then a magazine editor, asking how she should judge a prospective fiancé. His response, “Don’t look at how he treats you, look at how he treats his servants.” Or, in today’s language, “You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him” (variously attributed to Samuel Johnson, Ann Landers, Abigail Van Buren, von Goethe, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, and others).
6. As noted earlier, givers have to be careful not to overdo their giving and as a result not be able to do their own work. They need to set boundaries and learn to say no, not confusing being helpful and generous with being available for every person and every request all the time. Some people have a “5-minute” rule – “Can I offer something of unique value to this person that will take five minutes or less?” Others look for ways to be of help while keeping their own interests in clear view. They look for ways to help that are low cost or high benefit to themselves.
You likely know whether you are a “giver” or a “taker” or “matcher.” If you want confirmation, there is a self-assessment here. It might be worthwhile for you to take some time this week to reflect on this dimension of your style. I know that doing the research for and writing this essay has been very helpful to me. If you’re a giver, you might ask about your balance – are you giving too much and not able to complete your work? What changes might you make? If you’re a taker, you might ask yourself about your collaboration with others and what changes you might want or need to make. Further, everyone might also ask how what you’ve learned here might affect the composition of teams you form.
Make it a great week. . . . jim
Jim Bruce is a Senior Fellow and Executive Coach at MOR Associates, and Professor of Electrical Engineering, Emeritus, and CIO, Emeritus, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
References:
Adam Grant, Give and Take, Viking, 2013.
Adam Grant, Interview by Knowledge@WHARTON, Givers vs. Takers: The Surprising Truth about Who Gets Ahead, April 10, 2013.
Adam Grant, TEDTalk Are You a Giver or a Taker, Filmed November 2016.
Adam Grant, In the Company of Givers and Takers, Harvard Business Review, April 2013.
Adam Gran and Reb Rebele, Beat Generosity Burnout, Harvard Business Review, April 2017.
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (4)
- August 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (5)
- June 2024 (4)
- May 2024 (4)
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (5)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (5)
- September 2023 (4)
- August 2023 (4)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (4)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (3)
- November 2022 (5)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (4)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (5)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (5)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (4)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (7)
- May 2020 (5)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (3)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (3)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (8)
- May 2017 (5)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (12)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (10)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (7)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (12)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (10)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (5)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (10)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (8)
- June 2013 (6)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (4)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (2)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (3)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (2)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (1)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (1)
- September 2006 (3)
- August 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (2)
- April 2006 (1)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (1)
- January 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (1)
- November 2005 (2)
- October 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (2)
- March 2005 (4)
- February 2005 (2)
- December 2004 (1)