Feedback 102 – Giving Feedback
Last week we began a series of Tuesday Readings on the subject of feedback: Feedback in the workplace is the sharing of information between co-workers about the impact that their behavior is having on the team’s results, its processes, and/or its relationships. It can be positive in the form of affirmation of specific good work a co-worker is doing. Or, it can be in the form of correction needed in specific aspects of the work being done.
Today, we focus on Giving Feedback. In order to give feedback, you have to be alert to activities around you where it may be appropriate for you to give feedback. This means not only being aware of what’s going on but being willing to focus on the details; not only seeing the “headline” – Sam was arguing with the client at the client service desk – but also, understanding the substance. Unfortunately, we are so busy and so heads-down, buried in our devices, that we often move past situations without even being aware of what’s going on, and thereby lose an opportunity to give feedback.
I like to think of giving feedback, as I indicated last week, in terms of six steps, stated here as six simple questions:
1 What? What was the behavior that you observed?
2 Who? Who was involved?
3 Where? Where will you have your conversation with the individual?
4 Impact? What will be the likely impact of the behavior?
5 Actions? What actions will you suggest the feedback recipient take?
6 Understood? Does the recipient understand the issues?
Let’s look at each of these in some detail.
What? Behavior you have observed and which you, as a leader, want to see continued or changed, depending upon the positive or negative nature of the behavior, in order to improve performance and/or morale, and to develop your employees. On occasion you may need or be encouraged to give feedback based on reports of others. In these instances, it’s important to do a careful fact check to insure that you have all the details before you proceed.
It’s also important to describe the behavior involved in the most objective, specific language you can. Words like you had a “bad attitude” will likely not be understood in the same way you understand them, and may seem judgmental and lead to an argument. Instead, being specific, you might say, “When you were interacting with your client just now, you became angry, were not responsive to the questions asked by the client, and the client walked away with his issue unresolved.”
Who? The individual(s) you observed.
Where? I’m a firm believer that feedback needs to be timely, given as close in time to observation of the behavior as possible and almost always within 24 hours. Given the fast pace of life today, instances of both good and bad behavior are often not remembered in any detail if too much time passes before the feedback is given. Positive feedback can often be given in-place. “Alex, may I have a moment. I overheard your interaction with your client, just now, and I really appreciate the way you diffused the situation by smiling and affirmatively saying that you could help him. And, you did, carefully explaining what you were doing to the client’s satisfaction. As a result he went away smiling and satisfied.” Note, that if this conversation were overheard by colleagues, or clients, it would be OK. In fact the conversation might, hopefully, encourage others to step up their game.
If the conversation is corrective, you may need to schedule a time and have a private space. However, it’s important to indicate the need for a conversation as soon as possible. Chris and Chris’ manager were in a meeting where Chris was making a key strategic presentation. It was terrible. They walked away from the meeting together and the manager said, “You will do better next time. Let’s meet later today or tomorrow at the latest.” When they do meet, the manager can lay out the issues that were observed and together they can arrive at a development process to correct the shortcomings.
Note, in giving feedback, depending upon the situation, it may be appropriate and important to ask whether you might give the individual feedback. It’s entirely possible that the person doesn’t want feedback or doesn’t want it at the moment. And, that’s OK.
Impact? Behaviors always have some impact. Before you give your feedback, identify the expected impact. This will help the individual receiving the feedback understand the significance of his or her actions. When you are deeply focused on your work, you may not always think about the importance of having satisfied clients. Or, about whether the application will be easy to use and, therefore, increase the user’s satisfaction. Nor do we consider that when we go on a rant that is heard by a client, it impacts how the organization is seen. Thus, it is important to connect the behavior, whether good or bad, associated with the feedback to its impact on clients and other staff.
Actions? In almost all instances, along with the feedback you will have a request that the individual receiving the feedback take some action. For example, with Alex in the earlier example, you might encourage him to continue being the positive example that the customer observed. And, if Alex used some particular approach, you might encourage him to find an occasion to illustrate that approach to the team.
And, in the case of Chris, in the follow-on feedback conversation you could spell out what you expect be done to prepare for the “next time.” That, for example, might be following a specific process in preparing, showing you an early outline for comment, etc., as well as prep sessions with you where Chris practices the presentation.
Understood? You will want to test whether the feedback-recipient understands the feedback and what you expect to be done as a result. In a 1998 book Making Feedback Work, Joe Folkman writes: “If you receive [corrective] feedback but do not change for the better, you will be perceived more negatively than if you had not received feedback.” So, it is important that you instill the need for change. Following-up from time-to-time to track the individual’s progress can be effective here.
The keys to being able to give helpful feedback are three-fold: First, you need to become more aware of what is going on around you, and to pay attention to the details. Second, you need to believe that you can change your organization by giving feedback. And, third, we all need to take the opportunity to sharpen our feedback-giving skills and get into action. The result will be an organization with a culture where feedback is valued. And, that would be a good thing
Next week, we’ll continue our focus on feedback, considering receiving and asking for feedback. Have a great week as you work on this important skill.
. . . . jim
References
1 Interaction Associates, Workplace Feedback.
2 Ruth Hill, The Situation – Behavior – Impact Feedback Tool, MindTools.com.
3 Carol S. Dweck, The Perils and Promises of Praise.
Check it out:: MOR Insights
- December 2024 (3)
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (5)
- September 2024 (4)
- August 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (5)
- June 2024 (4)
- May 2024 (4)
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (5)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (5)
- September 2023 (4)
- August 2023 (4)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (4)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (3)
- November 2022 (5)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (4)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (5)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (5)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (4)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (7)
- May 2020 (5)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (3)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (3)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (8)
- May 2017 (5)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (12)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (10)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (7)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (12)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (10)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (5)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (10)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (8)
- June 2013 (6)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (4)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (2)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (3)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (2)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (1)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (1)
- September 2006 (3)
- August 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (2)
- April 2006 (1)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (1)
- January 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (1)
- November 2005 (2)
- October 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (2)
- March 2005 (4)
- February 2005 (2)
- December 2004 (1)