I Sit Too Much … and So Do You
[Jim Bruce, today’s author, is a Senior Fellow and Executive Coach at MOR Associates. He previously was Professor of Electrical Engineering, and Vice President for Information Systems and CIO at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Jim can be reached at [email protected].]
Elan Goldwaser, sports medicine specialist at New York Presbyterian Hospital, puts it this way: “Our bodies were not designed to sit for long periods of time, yet most or us are guilty of sitting too much. Regardless of our age or occupation, we sit … far more frequently than we should.”1 He continues, reporting that “The neck gets tense and tight because we’re straining. … We’re arching our neck a little bit, which increases the curvature of our backs … It puts strain on the trapezius muscle, which connects to the shoulder and the upper back to keep the neck in pace…We begin to develop those classic ‘knots. The whole back starts to arch forward because the muscles get a little strained and thus a little weaker. Over time that becomes tender, painful, and tight. ”1
And, the pandemic has not been helpful in this regard. In the office we frequently stood and walked to a colleague’s desk for a brief conversation. And, often the colleague stood as we approached, giving us both an opportunity to not sit. We walked to meetings, and maybe even got outdoors as we went to lunch or to a meeting in another building.
When we work from home, our colleagues and our meetings are on Zoom. No change in posture required unless we deliberately choose to stand (and have arranged our technology to enable that) or the presence of others requires you to go to another location or even outside. Research suggests that you rejoice in these opportunities to change your position and not begrudge them.
Nilofer Merchant, author and lecturer on collaborative leadership at Stanford, says that “sitting is the smoking of our generation.” She notes that excessive sitting is so “prevalent and so pervasive that we don’t even question how much we’re doing it. And, since everyone else is doing it, it doesn’t even occur to us that it’s not OK.”2 “Our whole culture invites you to take a seat. So, we know we have a huge job in front of us,”2 says Gavin Bradley, director of Active Working, an international group aimed at reducing excessive sitting.
Sitting too much is a serious matter. Medical researchers warn that prolonged sitting is dangerous. It is associated with a significantly higher risk of heart disease (6%), type 2 diabetes (7%), and breast and colon cancer (10%), along with muscle and joint problems. Some have gone on to say that the office chair is worse for your health than smoking and kills more people than HIV. An Australian doctor has been quoted as saying that excessive sitting, which he defined as more than nine hours per day, is a lethal activity. (And, here’s where you ask yourself just how many hours will I sit today? My guess, significantly more than nine.)
Even working out vigorously before or after work may not compensate for an extended time of sitting.
Bradley, of Active Working, says (as quoted by Brigid Schulte in the Washington Post3), “It’s all about mixing it up. Metabolism slows down 90% after 30 minutes of sitting. The enzymes that move the bad fat from your arteries to your muscles, where it can get burned off, slow down. The muscles in your lower body are turned off. And after two hours, good cholesterol drops 20 percent. Just getting up for five minutes is going to get things going again.”4
So, what might you do to reduce your time sitting? Possibilities include: Getting a standing desk (if you want to try the concept, put a carton of paper on your desk and place your laptop on that, it’s about the right height); stand during phone calls (or if you have several calls to make and don’t need to refer to materials, take a walk while you make the calls); stand at a whiteboard or a flip-chart and make notes there as you work through an issue; have as many meetings as possible away from your office and walk to each one; have a stand for your computer so that you can work away from your desk standing up (I saw a number of these on wheels recently when making a hospital visit); have stand up meetings, take the stairs, set a reminder to get up every 30 minutes; etc. And, for meetings with one or two other people, consider walking conversations. Merchant averages four walking meetings a week logging some 20 miles. (That’s a faster pace than most of us would take.)
Now, not all meetings with one or two people will work as a walking meeting. Merchant2 reports that about 30% of her invites to a walking meeting decline, saying that they are not sufficiently fit. Also, walking meetings won’t work when you need to use reference materials, when you need to write notes (maybe audio notes on a handheld device would work), or when it’s an intense negotiation. However, some of your meetings will work.
In the Harvard Business Review essay, How to Do Walking Meetings Right, Russell Clayton, Christopher Thomas and Jack Smothers report that recent research finds that the act of walking leads to increases in creative thinking. Also, there is anecdotal evidence suggesting that walking meetings lead to more honest exchanges with employees and are more productive than traditional sit-down meetings.
This HBR essay also reports that Ted Eytan, Medical Director of the Kaiser Permanente Center for Total Health emphasizes that our brains are more relaxed during walks due to the release of certain chemicals. This aids executive function, which governs how we focus on tasks and deal with unforeseen events, among other things. Dr. Eytan also believes walking meetings lead to better employee engagement by breaking down barriers between supervisor and subordinate or between coworkers. He sees the bonding achieved through walking meetings as a micro version of the bonding that can be experienced when coworkers travel together on business trips. Others have experienced this in meetings with individual team members: “The fact that we are walking side-by-side means the conversation is more peer-to-peer than when I am in my office and they are across a desk from me, which reinforces the organizational hierarchy.”
I hope that you are now convinced that you need to reduce your seat time. I know that I do. And, it is very hard. Also, I encourage you to have some of your one-on-ones as walking conversations. It would make for a worthy experiment. Start out slow, one for this week and if that works, try for two next week, and continue until you regularly have three or four walking meetings each week. After all, these are meetings that you would be holding anyway. You’re just changing the venue and opening up the possibilities. And, don’t forget the other ways that you might take to reduce your time sitting.
Researchers agree that we all sit far too much, about 10 hours per day – hours at the desk, focused on the computer screen, reading and writing emails, working on reports, eating lunch, in meetings, in front of the TV, surfing the web, playing video games, etc. For comparison, we sleep, on the average, about 7.7 hours each day. The number of hours sitting is about 40% (4 hours) too large. And, everyone agrees that only your individual action will change the situation.
So, let me challenge you, and myself, to take some action and experiment with reducing your seat time. Right now, take a few positive steps in this direction: For example, get a flip chart for your office and use it to capture ideas in one standing meeting you have for the coming week and schedule one outside walking meeting. I think that if you can get in the habit of sitting less and standing/walking more during your meetings you’ll find that it relaxes and energizes you and you’ll not turn back.
I trust that you and your colleagues will have a great week. . . jim
[An earlier version of this essay appeared as the Tuesday Reading for November 10, 2015.]
References:
- Elan Goldwasser, Is Too Much Sitting Harming Your Body?, New York Presbyterian Hospital Newsletter.
- Nilofer Merchant, Sitting Is the Smoking of Our Generation, Harvard Business Review, January 14, 2013. See also, Merchant, Got a Meeting? Take a walk, TED2013.
- Brigid Shulte, Health Experts Have Figured Out How Much Time You Should Sit Each Day, The Washington Post, June 2, 2015.
- See Pomodoro Technique, Wikipedia. The Pomodoro Technique is a time management method developed by Francesco Cirillo in the late 1980s. The technique uses a timer to break down work into intervals (each with a goal), traditionally 25 minutes in length, separated by short breaks. These intervals are named pomodoros, the plural in English of the Italian word pomodoro (tomato), after the tomato-shaped kitchen timer that Cirillo used as a university student. During the short break, typically about 5 minutes, you do something entirely different – take a short walk, talk with a colleague about a non-work matter, anything that takes your mind off the task you were working on and allows your brain to enter a diffuse state. For a more complete discussion see the July 16, 2018 Tuesday Reading, Learning How to Learn.
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (5)
- September 2024 (4)
- August 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (5)
- June 2024 (4)
- May 2024 (4)
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (5)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (5)
- September 2023 (4)
- August 2023 (4)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (4)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (3)
- November 2022 (5)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (4)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (5)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (5)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (4)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (7)
- May 2020 (5)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (3)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (3)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (8)
- May 2017 (5)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (12)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (10)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (7)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (12)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (10)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (5)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (10)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (8)
- June 2013 (6)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (4)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (2)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (3)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (2)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (1)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (1)
- September 2006 (3)
- August 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (2)
- April 2006 (1)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (1)
- January 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (1)
- November 2005 (2)
- October 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (2)
- March 2005 (4)
- February 2005 (2)
- December 2004 (1)