Putting Psychological Safety Into Leadership Context
Today’s Tuesday Reading is from Curtis Odom, MOR Associates Executive Coach and Program Leader. Curtis may be reached at [email protected] or via LinkedIn.
Here we are! I am authoring my first Tuesday reading after 12 years with MOR Associates. If you know me, you know I am rarely at a loss for words. However, I wouldn’t say I like to talk for the sake of talking. And what you may ask is the topic that finally compelled me to write a Tuesday Reading? Psychological Safety is the answer. Allow me to first set a foundational grounding for what I mean by psychological safety, as the term has been thrown around a lot lately in the common organizational vocabulary.
Psychological safety is a climate where people feel free to brainstorm out loud, voice half-finished thoughts, openly challenge the status quo, share feedback, and work through disagreements together. As I thought about the angle I wanted to take for this article, I was reminded of a phrase I’ve repeatedly heard: bring your whole self to work. Psychological safety is also about examining the well-being of the entire person and understanding the well-being of the whole individual and every individual within the organization. When we talk about psychological safety, we’re talking about the climate of an environment where you feel safe to take those interpersonal risks without facing the consequences. You bring your unique self to the group and add to the diversity of any group. However, we can only be our whole selves if we feel safe to do so. Suppose we don’t feel comfortable to do so. When we have psychological safety, we feel connected to a group; when it’s not there, we feel like an unwanted guest.
An unsafe psychological culture can lead to rampant imposter syndrome. It causes people to feel like they are imposters in a dangerous environment, which impacts the productivity and quality of an organization’s performance. However, the potential benefits of fostering psychological safety are immense. In 2019, a Gallup poll found that only three in 10 employees strongly agree that their opinions even count at work. Contrastingly, teams with high degrees of psychological safety reported higher levels of performance and lower levels of interpersonal conflict. They also learned that high psychological safety reduces stress and anxiety, increases job satisfaction, creativity, and innovation, and improves mental health. These positive outcomes should be a powerful motivator for leaders to prioritize psychological safety in their organizations.
Imagine, for a second, that you’re a brand new employee who has just joined your organization. You believe you have been hired because you have brought new perspectives and ideas, and one of your first tasks after a few weeks on the job is to present to your peers some ideas you have for a current project that started before you arrived. You put together your PowerPoint; you’re ready to discuss this in front of your group. You begin sharing ideas you’re passionate about, and you hear people say, “That’s not going to work here,” under their breath. Or perhaps they say, “That’s different from how we do things here,” which is scarcely more polite. Maybe one peer rolls their eyes, you have another person checking their phone, and even after that meeting, as you leave, someone leans over and says, “If you’re going to make it here, you might want to rethink your attire,” which is the final straw. Imagine being in a situation like that and how that might make you feel. How could you show up the way you want to in that space? Psychological safety is the belief held by people within a set group that one will not suffer any negative consequences from taking interpersonal risks. It is a climate where we can take risks, like sharing a new idea in a meeting, challenging the status quo, asking questions, making a change, or even admitting a mistake without fear of repercussion.
This is also connected to psychological safety in hybrid and online work. The virtual workplace has forced us to redefine what we mean by engagement. In the early COVID and quarantine days, something needed to be fixed if you didn’t have your camera on and weren’t engaging every five seconds. And we’ve come to learn more and more when we have these online interactions. We now know that we as leaders must find new ways to allow people to engage in manners that suit them.
It could be through chat, breakout group activities, or the small talk we make when we are early to a virtual meeting and wait for others to join. Whether in person, hybrid, or online, psychological safety plays a role in how you show up to work, your enthusiasm for work, and your desire to do your job. So, all those things play such a role, especially when working with different people and having other senior leaders, people leaders, managers, and supervisors who adopt that inclusive leadership style.
As you are reading this right now, I am sure you have had experiences where you’ve had high psychological safety in a specific group and situations where you’ve had low psychological safety in a group. What does it feel like working in an environment where psychological safety is high, where you think you can take interpersonal risks without fear of repercussion? It feels empowering. Liberating. You’re respected for your contributions, and you’re willing to be creative. The words empowering, energizing, and freeing could be used. Now, let’s look at the flip side of that. What does it feel for you in those moments when you have low psychological safety? It’s overwhelming. Anxious, isolating, distressing, stressful, annoying, and demoralizing. These feelings factor into inclusive leadership, getting to know the people you’re leading and adapting to their style so they can succeed. And as a leader of people, we started to adapt to what that looks like for psychological safety and adapting to people.
So, how do you create a space and a place for psychological safety? You have to be able to connect and care about the people you’re leading because you care about who they are as an employee and as a person. Leadership is about connecting with people. Those connections allow you to care more about what you’re doing. It gives you the energy to create a psychologically safe space for your team and yourself. If this is a topic you’d like to explore further, please also review Jim Bruce’s recent Tuesday Reading on this topic.
Which has best enabled you to create a sense of psychological safety?
Last week, we asked which best describes your ability to say “no” at work:
- 37% say “yes” way too much.
- 30% say “yes” a little more than they’d like.
- 20% feel well-balanced in saying “yes” or “no.”
- 7% say “no” a little more than they’d like.
- 6% say “no” way too much.
More than two out of every three of us feel we say “yes” to too much—that’s a lot! As leaders, what environment are we creating for our staff? Do they feel comfortable saying “no”? Given our role model, likely not. As we relate this topic to today’s reading on psychological safety, what might we do to create an environment without the felt need to overcommit?
- December 2024 (3)
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (5)
- September 2024 (4)
- August 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (5)
- June 2024 (4)
- May 2024 (4)
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (5)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (5)
- September 2023 (4)
- August 2023 (4)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (4)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (4)
- December 2022 (3)
- November 2022 (5)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (4)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (5)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (5)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (4)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (7)
- May 2020 (5)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (3)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (3)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (8)
- May 2017 (5)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (12)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (10)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (7)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (12)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (10)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (5)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (10)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (8)
- June 2013 (6)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (4)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (5)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (2)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (3)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (2)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (1)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (1)
- September 2006 (3)
- August 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (2)
- April 2006 (1)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (1)
- January 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (1)
- November 2005 (2)
- October 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (2)
- March 2005 (4)
- February 2005 (2)
- December 2004 (1)